Nepali Times
From The Nepali Press
Identity minus extremism, Kantipur



ANURAG ACHARYA
Identity politics has taken centre stage in Nepal, and the debate is getting increasingly polarised. There are those who are suspicious and think it's blasphemous to raise the identity debate and those who will settle for nothing less than ethnically demarcated provinces. However, both sides seem to have missed the point. The only way to resolve the growing hostility is by engaging in healthy debate. We all have multiple, intersecting identities, of which region, language, religion, and culture are important elements. While language, culture and customs are at the centre of the indigenous movement, in Madhes regional and linguistic identities are of major concern. Hence, any federal model must take these nuances into consideration.

Names of future federal units are secondary; the discussion should instead be focused on whether the new states can ensure equal rights and opportunities for people living within the boundaries and how to promote equal cultural and social relations among the residents. However, in order for this conversation to take place, people standing on the opposite sides of the identity debate must come to a compromise.



1. GoleGgole
Referendom in the disputed districts, the best and only solution.                Let us start first from say Jhapa.    The Jhapalis only have the right to opt for where they want to be. They can be with the proposed Limbuwan or remain as Kochila or join Mithila. That is. The only right thing which is democratic and legitimate. Likewise in Chitwan or Kanchapur. Etc etc.

LATEST ISSUE
638
(11 JAN 2013 - 17 JAN 2013)


ADVERTISEMENT









himalkhabar.com            

NEPALI TIMES IS A PUBLICATION OF HIMALMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | SUBSCRIPTION | TERMS OF USE | CONTACT