Ever since the brief but fierce war between India and China in 1962, the world’s two most populous countries have observed an uneasy truce, keeping their border dispute in a deep freeze. The Himalaya is hotting up 55 years later, and the cause is not just global warming.
When they met in Beijing in 1988, Deng Xiaoping and Rajiv Gandhi had an unwritten understanding to let the 3,000km Himalayan arc separate their spheres of influence. This pact has withstood numerous skirmishes along disputed borders in Arunachal, Ladakh and Bhutan, the Dalai Lama’s presence in India, and the lingering distrust between the two nuclear nations. Until now.
There are now geo-strategic rumblings along the Sino-Indian Himalayan border. China feels increasingly encircled, relations with Burma and Singapore have soured somewhat, and there is volatility in the Korean Peninsula and the South China Sea.
Beijing and New Delhi used to go out of their way not to irritate each other, but lately they are doing just the opposite. China has been preparing carefully for the post-Dalai Lama era, and could feel it expedient to keep the pot boiling on Tibet. Modi’s India could feel the need to perform an occasional war dance for domestic purposes.
It is mystifying why the latest flashpoint had to be the disputed Doklam Plateau near the Bhutan-China-India tri-junction in the Chumbi Valley, which itself is astride India’s strategic Chicken Neck corridor. The timing of this flareup just 100km away from a violent statehood agitation in Darjeeling is also intriguing (See page 4-5). All this is a rude awakening for happy little Bhutan, the only neighbouring country with which Beijing has no diplomatic ties.
Nepal cannot be unconcerned about tensions so close to our eastern flank. Those who are secretly delighted that Bhutan is getting caught up in this Clash of Titans may note that although Bhutan may depend on India for defence and foreign affairs, Nepali nationals are deployed by the Indian Army on the frontlines. As in 1962, thousands of Indian Gorkha soldiers could be killed if there was another Himalayan war.
We are forced to re-think the anomalous state of affairs where nationals of one country serve in the military of another, which is a foe of at least two of its own friendly neighbours.
India and China benefit from the fact that there is a 1,500km section of the Himalaya they don’t need to guard because Nepal is a buffer state. Nepal’s stability is in their interest. And it is in Nepal’s national interest that this conflict does not escalate. The sabre-rattling by the media on both sides is deafening. It has degenerated to the point where Indian journalists are resorting to racist epithets to counter belligerent prose in China’s semi-official Global Times. Going by the tone of Indian and Chinese social media content, war has already broken out.
New Delhi and Beijing need to put the Himalaya back into the deep freeze. Both countries have bigger things to worry about.
'Bhutan-Nepal bhai-bhai', Kanak Mani Dixit
'Squeezed in the Himalaya', Sean Shoemaker
Giving in to Gorkhaland, Akanshya Shah