The death and destruction caused by the earthquake of 25 April was so vast that it overwhelmed Nepal and its people. It didn’t just kill tens of thousands of people, destroyed homes and temples, but it also put out on full display just how badly governed the country is. Not that we didn’t know it here.
A decade after the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, two Constituent Assembly elections and multiple deadline extensions later, a new constitution is in limbo. By now, all Nepalis know that the bickering among the leaders was not so much over the contentious issues of the new constitution but over power.
If Nepalis distrusted their government before the great earthquake, the state’s delayed response to the disaster, lack of coordination among its entities for rescue and relief, followed by reports of all earthquake relief funds coming into the country being automatically directed to the Prime Minister’s Disaster Relief Fund only deepened it. Citizens joined up on social media to raise a hue and cry.
Despite the strong backlash from the public as well as international community no official from the Central Bank made an effort to clear the confusion about its directive. Finally, National Planning Commission member Swornim Wagle had to go on Facebook to clarify.
Wagle wrote: ‘I have been swamped with queries on what the recent Central Bank directive on transfer of funds after the April 25 earthquake means. I share your concerns. But it only affects bank accounts that were opened in the last 6 days under the direct subject of “quake relief”. People, agencies, NGOs, donors with established bank accounts before April 25 can continue to receive and mobilise funds just as they used to in the past.’
He went on to explain the structure, accessibility and transparent nature of the fund, consoling everyone there was no way it could be misused by any officials.
Wagle’s post helped donors and individuals who had sent money to the country breathe a collective sigh of relief. However, the damage had already been done. It is unlikely that people around the world will feel the urge to donate when there is so much uncertainty, and so much distrust of government.