|
|
If there is one thing that symbolises how far we have come in nearly two years of the peace process, it is the sight of the newly re-inducted Maoist ministers walking around with (ex-royal) Nepal Army bodyguards.
It should be a small extra step from this to integrate the two armies, but things are not as simple as that. Our army for many years was a largely ornamental force that paraded on Tundikhel twice a year and was at the beck and call of the palace. November 2001 changed all that, and for the next five years the army fought a dirty internal war that badly tarnished its reputation.
Nepal's defence budget tripled during the war years, the number of men under arms nearly doubled. We can't afford, and don't need, such a massive military. With the peace process, there is an opportunity to clean up the institution and move from a feudal praetorian guard to a non-partisan, professional force under elected civilian command.
So, how do you reconcile adding tens of thousands of ex-guerrillas into an army that should be downsized? Is soldiering the only job we have to offer ex-combatants? Downsizing and integration of Maoists into the army go under the acronym SSR (security sector reform).
Gen Katuwal's uncharacteristically direct comments after visiting India and before his China trip were echoed by the prime minister this week. However much UNMIN and the Europeans may push SSR, it looks like our giant neighbours aren't that fond of the idea. Now that we are getting ready to vote out a monarchy that used to be the symbol of nationalism, it is even more important to have a de-politicised army that is above the fray.

