BBC Nepali Service: Were you hand-picked by the Maoists as a Supreme Court (SC) justice when you were a senior advocate?
Chief Justice Sushila Karki: I am neither a Maoist nor a Congress. If anything, I am a democrat. They say I was hand-picked by the Maoists, but I have heard that the Congress leaders are cursing themselves for recommending my name because I delivered verdicts that were not favourable to them.
But is it not true that you were recommended by the Nepali Congress (Democratic) to be a member of the Interim Constitution Drafting Committee?
I do not know who recommended my name at that time. Now, all political parties, except the RPP-N, want to take credit for that. I dare any political leader to claim that I begged them to make me a justice.
Do you feel you lacked experience when appointed directly to the SC?
True, I did not have experience working as a judge, but I had the knowledge. It was not so difficult. I had not studied commerce, so I faced problems when hearing cases about tax and revenue matters. But I was good at hearing criminal cases right from my first day at the SC.
Would it not have been easier for you if you had started working as a judge at the appellate court?
I do not think so. All I needed to work as a SC justice was courage, and I had that. Public prosecutors plead, and their statements are drafted and presented to us. Then, we get the statements from the defence lawyers. We thoroughly examine both, and reach a conclusion. If we are confused, we consult each other.
Who should be afraid of you as the new Chief Justice?
I do not think anyone should be afraid of me. But I will not spare those who are corrupt.
You spoke about CIAA Chief Lokman Singh Karki in the Parliamentary Hearing Committee.
I ran into him for the first time today, and asked him why he is spreading rumours that we are brother and sister. He just grinned, and did not say anything.
But the fact that you met him for the first time today does not prove that you are not a relative of his.
I do not know who he is, and I have not passed a single ruling about any case involving him in his private capacity. A case involving the CIAA should not be his personal case. But if the CIAA is involved in wrongdoing, should I not hear a case against it?
