Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal along with the biggest team ever  in the history, is visiting India today. People are not told why so  much state money is being spent: whether India wants to get things  done or Nepal wants Indian grace to sustain the government.

Nepal was defeated in two constituencies, and yet is now the prime  minister of Nepal. He has no future in politics and is therefore trying to get back his lost position in the party by spending  state money. He organises banquets in his residence everyday.

These are ethical questions. It is up to an individual to decide what  is right and wrong.
A person in power should be conscious about  this. How ethical is it for a person who lost elections to be prime minister? Such a weak person should  not sign any treaty or agreement that will have a lasting impact,  even if he does it will have no legal or moral ground. According to  precedent one third of parliamentary consent is required to  sign a treaty with another country. The Maoist members make up 40  per cent of parliament and they have already warned Nepal not to  sign any treaty during the visit, which automatically makes any  agreement signed by Nepal unconstitutional.